BuzzFeed: “Welcome to America — Now Spy on Your Friends”

The FBI has been pressuring Muslim immigrants who face long delays when applying for permanent residency and US citizenship to become informants in order to expedite their cases, a BuzzFeed News investigation alleges.

The investigation, based on government and court documents, official complaints, interviews with immigrants, immigration and civil rights lawyers, and former special agents, finds that pressuring Muslim applicants to become informants in order to have their cases expedited—or, conversely, threatening to deport them if they do not comply—violates the FBI’s own rules regarding informants. These rules are detailed in the “Attorney General’s Guidelines Regarding the Use of FBI Confidential Human Sources” and forbid FBI agents from making any promises or commitments regarding the “alien status of any person or the right of any person to enter or remain in the United States.”   

Moreover, according to these guidelines, agents must explicitly warn potential informants that the FBI cannot assist with their immigration status in any way. BuzzFeed finds the opposite has happened:

Mandated to enforce the law, the bureau has assumed a powerful but unacknowledged role in a very different realm: decisions about the legal status of immigrants — in particular, Muslim immigrants. First the immigration agency ties up their green card applications for years, even a decade, without explanation, then FBI agents approach the applicants with a loaded offer: Want to get your papers? Start reporting to us about people you know.

BuzzFeed shares the story of one Pakistani software programmer named A.M. (he did not want his name used), who had spent seven years attempting to obtain a Green Card. After a series of interviews, three encounters with the FBI, and unexplained bureaucratic delays, with his work visa shortly expiring and no apparent end in site, he decided to file suit against the Department of Homeland Security, US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), and the FBI.  Afterwards at another meeting with the FBI he was asked to write down names of people he thought were terrorists. When he replied that he didn’t know any terrorists nor was he aware of any suspicious activity, he reported to BuzzFeed that one of the agents told him: “We know about your immigration problems…And we can help you with that.” The catch: he had to make secret reports on his community, friends, and family.

He refused, and shortly thereafter immigration authorities revoked A.M.’s existing work visa and FBI agents turned up unannounced at his home and workplace. Soon A.M. and his family sold their possessions and left the US, where he had lived for seventeen years. 

The goal for the FBI, BuzzFeed reports, is to take advantage of many immigrants’ desperation no matter how useful their supposed “terrorist” contacts would be or if they even have any reliable intelligence about terrorism. This wide-scale approach to intelligence gathering is not even effective according to Michael German, a former FBI agent who is now a national security expert at New York University’s Brennan Center for Justice. He told BuzzFeed. “All of this investigative effort is against people who are not suspected,” he said, of “terrorism or any other criminal activity.” He added: “This becomes an obstacle to real security.”

Many delays for Muslim immigrants begin with the Controlled Application Review and Resolution Program (CARRP), a once secret USCIS program designed to identify security risks among applicants for visas, asylum, Green Cards, and naturalization. Established in 2008, CARRP targets a wide range of applicants, including not only suspected or known terrorists, but also for applicants based on a range of criteria, including geographical factors, knowledge of someone who is under surveillance, whether any money transfers have been made abroad, having worked for a foreign government, or even certain foreign language skills.

With CARRP, critics contend, the FBI can easily influence the immigration process. Indeed a 2013 report by the ACLU found that immigration authorities “are instructed to follow FBI direction as to whether to deny, approve, or hold in abeyance (potentially indefinitely) an application for an immigration benefit.”

Christopher Bentley, a USCIS spokesperson, told BuzzFeed that each applicant’s file is reviewed and decided by immigration officials alone (not law enforcement) on a “case-by-case” basis. The FBI’s National Press Office said they couldn’t comment to BuzzFeed on the specific strategies and tactics used to recruit informants.

While many have criticized the FBI’s use of informants within Muslim communities, after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, the FBI believed recruiting informants within the Muslim community was crucial to preventing future terrorist attacks. The Heritage Foundation details at least eighty-one potential terrorist attacks they say have been thwarted since 9/11 and notes that the use of informants was key to preventing many of the attacks. The authors stated: “Both government outreach efforts and the vigilance of Muslim communities against terrorism have proven vital in protecting the US” while noting that “more must be done to enhance mutual trust and partnerships between government, intelligence, and law enforcement and Muslim communities.” And after the recent San Bernardino terror attacks, Edward Gernat, a supervisory special agent for the FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Force in San Diego, explaining how the FBI operates in general, told the San Diego Union-Tribune: “Our No. 1 goal is to prevent acts of terrorism…We will use any law enforcement tool legally available to us to prevent an act.”

USCIS Announces Revised Procedures for Determining Visa Availability for Certain Applicants Waiting to File for Adjustment of Status

US Citizenship & Immigration Services (USCIS) along with the Department of State (DOS) is revising the procedures for determining visa availability for applicants waiting to file for employment-based or family-sponsored preference adjustment of status. The revision in the process means that certain people will be eligible to file their adjustment of status applications (and the interim benefits that go along with that filing including work cards and travel permission) earlier than the date their Green Card priority date becomes current. USCIS states that the "revised process will better align with procedures DOS uses for foreign nationals who seek to become U.S. permanent residents by applying for immigrant visas at U.S. consulates and embassies abroad."
 
Implementing President Obama's November 2014 executive actions on immigration—as detailed in the White House report, Modernizing and Streamlining Our Legal Immigration System for the 21st Century—the revised process will enable foreign nationals (and their spouses) to obtain work cards and travel permission faster than they might have, and enable DOS to more accurately predict overall immigrant visa demand and determine the cut-off dates for visa issuance published in the monthly Visa Bulletin. All this, according to USCIS, will "help ensure that the maximum number of immigrant visas are issued annually as intended by Congress, and minimize month-to-month fluctuations in Visa Bulletin final action dates."

What Is the Visa Bulletin?

Every month the DOS publishes the current immigrant visa availability in a monthly Visa Bulletin. This Visa Bulletin indicates when statutorily limited visas are available to prospective immigrants based on their individual priority date for both the family-based and employment-based preference categories. The priority date is generally the date when the applicant’s relative or employer properly filed the immigrant visa petition on the applicant’s behalf with USCIS; or, if a labor certification was required to be filed with the applicant’s immigrant visa petition, the priority date is when the labor certification application was accepted for processing by the Department of Labor. Availability of an immigrant visa means eligible applicants are able to take the final steps in the process of becoming US permanent residents—namely, applying for an immigrant visa at a US Embassy or Consulate abroad or else applying for an adjustment of status to permanent residency if in the US.

What is Changing in the Visa Bulletin?

Effective in the October Visa Bulletin, there are now two charts per visa preference category:

• Application Final Action Dates (dates when immigrant visas may finally be issued); and
• Dates for Filing Applications (earliest dates when applicants may be able to apply for adjustment of status).

Applicants can use the charts to determine when they are eligible to file their Form I-485, Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status. USCIS states that to determine whether additional visas are available they will compare the number of visas available for the remainder of the fiscal year with:

• Documentarily qualified visa applicants;
• Pending adjustment of status applications; and
• Historical drop-off rate, including denials, withdrawals, and abandonments.

Who is Affected?

The October Visa Bulletin introduces the new adjustment filing date chart and allows many people who have been waiting for their Green Card priority date to become current to now file for the adjustment of status. Significantly the "Dates for Filing" for China-born and Indian-born nationals in the EB-2 category is May 1, 2014 and July 1, 2011, respectively, which is years ahead of these Green Card priority dates (January 1, 2012 and May 1, 2005, respectively). The changes also affect family-based visa applicants. Therefore, someone who has been waiting for a priority date for their Green Card may be able to apply for adjustment of status earlier. They will not get their Green Card unless the Green Card priority date becomes current but they will enjoy the benefits of being an adjustment applicant, namely the interim work card and travel permission that they can keep while their adjustment of status application remains pending.

For those eligible to apply, USCIS has more information about filing the adjustment of status. One of the most sought after benefits and advantages to filing adjustment of status is that applicants can concurrently file employment authorization and travel permission applications. An experienced immigration attorney will be able to advise if foreign nationals are eligible to file for adjustment of status and what the next steps would involve.

UPDATE SEPTEMBER 25, 2015: The Department of State (DOS) has today unexpectedly published an updated and revised October 2015 Visa Bulletin. This bulletin supersedes the bulletin for October 2015 that was originally published on September 9, 2015, and the revised dates affect priority and filing dates for certain nationalities. US Citizenship & Immigration Services explains:

Following consultations with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the Dates for Filing Applications for some categories in the Family-Sponsored and Employment-Based preferences have been adjusted to better reflect a timeframe justifying immediate action in the application process. The Dates for Filing Applications sections on pages 4 and 6, which have been adjusted, have been identified in bold type and highlighted.

Applicants are advised to use the revised chart when determining eligibility to file adjustment of status applications. Applicants are advised to consult with qualified immigration attorneys for questions about eligibility and the revised visa bulletin. We will post more information as we receive it.

UPDATE SEPTEMBER 8, 2015: Immigrants are protesting the amendments to the October Visa Bulletin by sending flowers to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Inspired by the nonviolent protest methods of Mahatma Gandhi, immigrants are sending bouquets and letters of protest decrying the bulletin reversal that affected thousands of excited applicants who were preparing to file their adjustment of status applications. Many applicants spent between $2,000 to $5,000 to prepare for the applications, not to mention countless hours and often days tracking down often difficult to obtain paperwork.
 
"We started making plans," Sridhar Katta, a mechanical engineer and M.B.A. who lives in Seattle with his wife and sixteen-year-old twin boys, said to CNN. "All our hopes were dashed within a matter of days." So far the Department of Homeland Security has only issued vague comments about the sudden turn-around. One DHS spokeswoman told CNN: "Further analysis of a recently published Visa Bulletin, intended to improve the issuance of green cards, showed that some of the new filing dates in that bulletin did not accurately reflect visa availability." Whatever happens, one can only hope that the sweet smell of the flowers will remove the sour taste left in our mouths.

UPDATE SEPTEMBER 22, 2015: In the latest Kafka-esq development in the ongoing saga stemming from the October 2015 Visa Bulletin updates and revisions that have affected thousands of immigrants, USCIS announced that beginning with the November 2015 DOS Visa Bulletin, if USCIS "determines that there are more immigrant visas available for a fiscal year than there are known applicants for such visas" they will state on the USCIS website that applicants may use the "Dates for Filing Visa Applications" chart. Otherwise, immigrants will need to use the the "Application Final Action Date" to determine when to file their adjustment of status applications. USCIS states that they anticipate making this determination each month and posting the relevant chart on their website within one week of visa bulletin publication.

AILA: Delays in Production of Work Authorization and Green Cards

The American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) is reporting that there are delays in the issuance of employment authorization and permanent resident cards (aka Green Cards) after approvals of I-765 and I-485 applications. US Citizenship & Immigration Services (USCIS) has confirmed through AILA that because the card production facility in Corbin, KY is undergoing maintenance, all card production work has been transferred to the facility in Lee's Summit, MO, resulting in a production backlog. Recipients may therefore not receive their cards until two to three weeks after application approval. USCIS anticipates that the backlog will be resolved in September 2015.

New York Times: "Want a Green Card? Invest in Real Estate"

Investing in real estate to secure permanent residency status (i.e., a Green Card) in the US has increasingly become big business in New York City. Through the EB-5 Immigrant Investor visa, which was created in 1990 by Congress "to stimulate the US economy through job creation and capital investment by foreign investors," foreign nationals (more than eighty percent from China) are investing billions of dollars into commercial and residential NYC projects, including hotels, condominiums, officer towers, and public works. The New York Times breaks down the investments: 

Twelve-hundred foreigners have poured $600 million into projects at Hudson Yards; 1,154 have invested $577 million in Pacific Park Brooklyn, the development formerly known as Atlantic Yards; and 500 have put $250 million into the Four Seasons hotel and condominium in the financial district. The list of projects involving EB-5 investments also includes the International Gem Tower on West 47th Street and the New York Wheel on Staten Island.

To qualify for the EB-5 investor visa, foreign nationals must invest $1 million, or in some cases $500,000, and create ten full-time jobs. In certain cases, foreign nationals can invest in projects approved by a US Citizenship & Immigration Services as designated Regional Center. Securing a Green Card through the EB-5 program is generally faster than obtaining one through other employment-based and some family-based routes, although Chinese nationals may now face delays since their country quotas will likely be met, resulting in backlogs of about two years.

The popularity of the EB-5 program has surged in the last four years. In fiscal year 2010, 1,885 visas were issued through the program, and in fiscal year 2013, the figure jumped by 354 percent to 8,564. Last year the entire annual allotment of 10,000 EB-5 visas were used by August, before the end of the fiscal year in October. As the program becomes more popular, it's unclear if Congress will raise the quota or perhaps the investment minimum. The surge in popularity has been attributed to not only the recession which made securing traditional funding and loans difficult to obtain but also the realization that many EB-5 investors require significantly less of a financial return than traditional loans, as EB-5 investors are more concerned about securing Green Cards. It's not only real estate projects benefiting from EB-5 investments—hospitals, ski resorts, and even state turnpikes have seen EB-5 funding as well.

The EB-5 program has faced significant criticism over the years. An Op-Ed in the New York Times once said that ‘’the program is so rife with fraud and corruption that it could actually have the opposite impact and deter investment." Numerous reports have detailed some instances of serious fraud, and if a project fails the investor can lose both the funding and the Green Card. But Peter Joseph, Executive Director of Invest in the USA, defended the program: '''It's a win for the investor, who's seeking to get an immigration benefit, along with a return on their investment, along with the American worker who's able to get to work, thanks to the capital investment coming through the program[.]'''

Is a Sock Drug Paraphernalia (And How Is that Relevant to Immigration)?

In 2010, Moones Mellouli, a Tunisian national and US lawful permanent resident with two master's degrees from the University of Missouri-Columbia and jobs as an actuary and as a math instructor at the university, was arrested for driving under the influence and having four Adderall pills in his sock. After he plead guilty to a misdemeanor for possession of drug paraphernalia—i.e., the sock in which he had the four pills—he got a suspended sentence plus a year's probation. Then he was ordered removed (i.e. deported).

Mr. Mellouli appealed and last month the Supreme Court heard oral arguments on the case, which is essentially about "whether a minor drug offense must render a lawful permanent resident deportable from his home and family in the United States." This is not the first time the Supreme Court has considered such a question.

From NPR: "Federal law allows the government to deport a non-citizen convicted in state court for a crime 'relating to' any drug controlled under the federal criminal code. But state laws often make many more drugs illegal, and Kansas law treats any container used to store a drug as 'drug paraphernalia.'" The SCOTUS blog noted that during the oral arguments the Justices "probed in detail the meaning of the language and how it applied to the case at hand." In the end, "a majority of the Court seemed to side with...Mellouli’s interpretation" and Mellouli "had the better of the statutory argument."

Justice Samuel Alito made an interesting point, which also might suggest which way the Court is leaning: "'It's really hard to believe that the Kansas statute actually regards as drug paraphernalia any thing that is used at any time to contain a controlled substance.'"